Alexis Blokhina vs Kira Pavlova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance impact predictions? Alexis Blokhina leads with 43.64% points won on second serve, surpassing Kira Pavlova's 36.94% over the past 6 months.
• Examining the return game, Kira Pavlova seems slightly stronger, winning 48.74% of opponent's second serve points compared to Blokhina’s 46.34% recently. They also edge out Blokhina on first serve returns with 36.04% to 35.37%.
• Under pressure, Blokhina shows resilience by saving 49.36% of breakpoints, outperforming Pavlova's 42.86% in high-pressure scenarios.
• Assessing overall yearly performance, Blokhina holds a notable edge with a win rate of 68.33%, while Pavlova has won 54.55% of her matches.
• On clay surfaces, Blokhina dominates with a 63% win rate, whereas Pavlova struggles with only 25% wins. However, Pavlova fares better on indoor hard courts with a 63% win rate.
• Both players largely competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, but Blokhina achieved a higher win percentage of 67.39% versus Pavlova's 49.06%.
• What's the average opponent ranking faced? Blokhina faced slightly tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 408.72, whereas Pavlova's opponents averaged 413.11.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Blokhina shows superior performance, winning 84% of such sets, while Pavlova manages 45%.

Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Alexis Blokhina and Kira Pavlova promises to be competitive, with each player showing distinct areas of strength. In terms of second serve effectiveness, Blokhina presents a strong edge, which is often a crucial factor in determining match outcome. Conversely, Pavlova's return game stats, particularly against second serves, suggest she could pose challenges in breaking Blokhina’s rhythm.

Blokhina's breakpoint-saving ability and her higher win percentage over the past year further indicate her composure and consistency in tight situations. Additionally, her impressive record in deciding sets gives her a psychological advantage if the match extends to the wire.

Considering surface preferences, Blokhina's proficiency on clay is notable, but since both players predominantly compete in similar tier tournaments, respective match-up stats become pivotal. The slight superior opponent quality faced by Blokhina and her overall performance metrics highlight her as a more formidable opponent.

In this match-up, Alexis Blokhina emerges as the likely winner, given her robust service statistics, match-play adaptability, and resilience under pressure.